DVR Chatter

Discussing the DCT-6412, Home Theater Devices, Entertainment, Celebrity and the Cable Industry. Not affiliated with any Cable Company, Hardware Manufacturer or Software Developer.




You are not logged in.

#1 05-02-2008 12:26:35 AM

Frank
DVR Chatter Honcho
From: Bucks, PA
Registered: 02-12-2005
Posts: 2781
PM  Website

Sezmi Death Watch: Day 1

The whole time I'm reading about Sezmi, a new TV service that utilizes three different technologies to deliver video content to customers, I'm thinking "This is so going to fail."  The question is: How long until it does?

Am I cynical? Probably.  But how many of these hybrid services have we seen come and go?  A lot more than have stayed.

Here are the basics:

At its heart is a TV set-top box that receives video content in three different ways. Two are available through other means: digital over-the-air local broadcasts, the kind that are available to anyone with a digital TV and a rabbit-ear antenna; and Internet downloads through the home's broadband connection.

The third delivery method would be unique to Sezmi. It plans to have local TV stations use vacant portions of their airwaves to transmit basic cable channels like Nickelodeon and Discovery. Given the limited spectrum available, the stations won't be able to transmit a full lineup, and only some of it will be in high definition. Sezmi plans to mitigate that by having stations send out the most-watched shows and have the set-top boxes save them on their hard drives, making them available for viewing on demand.

OK - so for my local HD content and for the most popular cable channels, I've got to have good OTA reception?  Well, I don't.  So now what?  Fail.

The additional over-the-air cable content is reminiscent of a service called MovieBeam, which was started by The Walt Disney Co. When it shut down in December after a four-year run, it had 1,800 subscribers.

I hope this service can survive with less than 1,800 subscribers. 

Sezmi is counting on phone companies, and perhaps also wireless carriers, to market the service as a bundle with Internet service. A cheap TV product would give landline phone companies a way to fend off the encroachment of cable companies, who are rapidly signing up people for their voice services.

The largest phone companies, AT&T Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc., have their own TV services, but they're expensive to roll out. Smaller companies, like Embarq Corp., have marketing deals with satellite companies, but those yield little in the way of synergies.

So who wasted their money on this?

Its funding comes from six venture-capital firms, including Morgenthaler Ventures, which helped Apple Inc. get off the ground.

Offline

 

#2 05-02-2008 9:01:49 AM

jganyard
Member
Registered: 09-09-2005
Posts: 344
PM

Re: Sezmi Death Watch: Day 1

Sq-whooooooosh... why did anyone invest in this?  Did they actually read the technical details of the business plan?  Good lord... sounds like something I would have read in 1999 right before the tech bubble burst.

Offline

 

#3 05-02-2008 11:31:46 AM

Wareagle
Charter Member
From: Bellevue, WA
Registered: 02-15-2005
Posts: 918
PM

Re: Sezmi Death Watch: Day 1

Even if it works perfectly, who would want it?  roll

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson